- Title
- Seroprevalence of Q fever among metropolitan and non-metropolitan blood donors in New South Wales and Queensland, 2014-2015
- Creator
- Gidding, Heather F.; Faddy, Helen M.; Durrheim, David N.; Graves, Stephen R.; Nguyen, Chelsea; Hutchinson, Penny; Massey, Peter; Wood, Nicholas
- Relation
- Medical Journal of Australia Vol. 210, Issue 7, p. 309-315
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja2.13004
- Publisher
- John Wiley & Sons
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2019
- Description
- Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of exposure to the causative agent of Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) and of current infections among blood donors in Australia. Design, setting: Cross-sectional study in metropolitan Sydney and Brisbane, and in non-metropolitan regions with high Q fever notification rates (Hunter New England in New South Wales; Toowoomba in Queensland). Participants: Blood donors attending Red Cross collection centres during October 2014 – June 2015 who provided sera and completed a questionnaire on Q fever vaccination status, diagnosis and knowledge, and exposure history. Main outcome measures: Age- and sex-standardised seroprevalence of phase II IgG antibodies to C. burnetii (indicating past exposure) and independent risk factors for seropositivity; presence of C. burnetii DNA (indicating current infection and risk of transmission by blood transfusion). Results: 2740 donors (94.5% response rate) completed the questionnaire and supplied sera for analysis. Crude antibody seroprevalence was 3.6%. Standardised seroprevalence was higher in non-metropolitan than metropolitan regions (NSW, 3.7% v 2.8%; Queensland, 4.9% v 1.6%; statistically significant only in Queensland). Independent predictors of antibody seropositivity were regular contact with sheep, cattle, or goats (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.3; 95% CI, 2.1–14), abattoir work (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2–3.9), and assisting at an animal birth (aOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2–3.6). Having lived in a rural area but having only rare or no contact with sheep, cattle or goats was itself a significant risk factor (v never lived rurally: aOR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1–5.9). 40% of people in groups recommended for vaccination were aware of the vaccine; 10% of people in these groups had been vaccinated. C. burnetii DNA was not detected in 1681 non-metropolitan samples, suggesting that transmission by blood donation is unlikely. Conclusions: Given their exposure to multiple risk factors, vaccination against Q fever should be considered for all rural residents.
- Subject
- epidemiology; Q fever; risk factors; blood donors; New South Wales; Queensland
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1451679
- Identifier
- uon:44245
- Identifier
- ISSN:0025-729X
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1769
- Visitors: 1768
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|